For the first time I will quote someone else on the Internet. This is part of a long series of firsts, and beautifully relevant to this letter as a whole.
The post in question is Birds and the Internet, by Steph Russo, whom I have the honor of considering a friend. Go on and read it; I will be paraphrasing large portions, but it’s worth savoring on its own.
Birds takes the approach of a clever metaphor to broach the issue of identity on the Internet. It’s all about birds. Little birds, big birds, fluffy and sleek, forever darting about in the branches of a Tree.
They build nests of varying proportion and size, all throughout the vast and sprawling branches of this forest mammoth. As you duck through the leaves and peer up into the golden sunlight, you will see dark nests, warm and cozy nests, hovels for the black-hearted and the loud-mouthed and palaces for the flashing famous.
You may begin to recognize a few feathered faces.
My gleeful abuse of extended metaphor will soon rival Ms. Russo’s, so onward and downward, to brass tacks.
The original post was a summary of the cycle of internet abuse and withdrawal, and an observation that the sheer depth of the ocean was frightening.
Which is true, as far as it goes. Some of my most vivid fears are of dark, deep water. No one wants to drown. But that’s not what interested me in particular.
One of the comments mentioned that biologically, it’s simply impossible for human beings to keep up with the level of non-stop socialization with which we are bombarded.
Which is probably true, for the question it answers. I am always fundamentally mistrustful of social Darwinism, but I have no particular argument with that assertion.
What interested me is something you may or may not have noticed about that post. It was a side issue, a secondary statement, slipping around the main narrative.
And that was the question of identity. Negatively expressed, it is the question of duplicity.
Why is this little bird flirting with so many nests? Why does this little bird need to be a heavy metal bird, a knitting bird, a writing bird, and a sports bird, all at different times and different places?
Did you wonder that also? Are you wondering now?
The issue intrigued me. And when I use the word “intrigue” it means my fanatical eyes positively glow at the smell of blood in the water. The whole thing was a question, a tangled tissue of questions, of Questions.
Why? Why not? How? When? Who?
My first and most instinctive reaction was to explore the issue in dualist terms. Splitting yourself into multiple, one-dimensional personalities was dishonest. I have a respect bordering on worship for the simple and impossible virtue of honesty, because I am such a cheap, perpetual liar.
I will say that I have learned to trust first impressions. But I will not say that there is no more depth to the question than that.
Why do we establish these single-minded personae?
Like the man who finds a hooded punk in his house at midnight, I have a hard time believing there’s a noble reason for what I notice.
My most solid observation is my own experience, and I’m not sure what conclusions I’ll be able to draw beyond those. Unfortunately, this means I’ll have to do my best to avoid the other thing I really like doing: engaging in sarcastic self-mockery. This practice began as an effort to be honest and to confess things I really didn’t want to say. It has turned into a gleeful exercise in stabbing myself in the back, and I can’t let that continue.
I picked a theme for this blog for artistic reasons. I wanted a Theme. My ego is screaming at me about pride and selfishness and dreams of grandeur; all things that might or might not be true. I have made the choice to let them go.
The theme is winter. Cold, aloof, crystal clear, white as snow and dark as the shadows behind the mountains. Clean and bleak like a frosted plain or a bare tree, icy like the fingers of death wrapped around the world.
By no means, as I agree, the most inviting image. But I am the sort of person who takes refuge in pride, who likes the cold, the dark, and the faceless. The idea and the image of winter has always held a poisonous attraction for me.
I believe I’ve done a pretty good job sticking with my theme. It helped that I was writing in the depths of an actual winter, and had plenty of breathless blue and gray days from which to draw mood and inspiration.
But now the lush, violent warmth and life of summer are crowding in on me, demanding my attention, and the child in my heart who has somehow survived these last few years is happy to touch the leaves and smell the flowers. There is a poetry of a whole lifetime in standing out of doors in a warm spring rain.
And I want to share the warmth with you as well. I want to share these moments when I begin again to uncoil, to thaw, to come out blinking into life and all it means. They are moments that quite literally bring me to tears. I never thought, in even the brightest spots of that bitter valley, that I could ever be so happy.
So without my inner cynic crying voyeurism and publicity (honestly, I trust that voice less and less each time it speaks. Publicity? What audience?) I want to tell you who I am. More than that. I don’t want to trumpet my failures and be forced to silence my victories. What good is there in that?
Return to the question at hand. What does it mean to separate your personality, to only say certain things in certain places? Philosophy is a discipline like gold mining. One thing that can make you truly happy is striking the big questions. The longer it takes to answer and the more lengthy words you can use, the better.
So with this question. I find it is not merely ethical but also societal and …mannerly.
Clearly, when you join a heavy metal forum, it is out of the question to begin discussing soft rock. Unless you have a sense of ethics as stubbornly pugnacious as mine, you will have no reason to do so, and you will have a very good reason not to do so: simple etiquette.
Now that I think on it, this is why so many forums have an uncategorized section. The internet is a two-dimensional medium for three-dimensional beings, and occasionally they want to discuss other facets with people they already know and presumably like.
Understandable, then, this far and no farther. Places are established for the sake of discussing one particular topic. To aid the cause of intelligibility, the citizens of such tiny city-states agree to hold off on all the little irrelevancies that make real-world interaction what it is.
And I learned something about the Internet I didn’t before, namely one of the reasons it is so ultimately unsatisfactory. It’s a broad and shallow pool – no matter how you roll or contort you can’t fit your whole self into it.
Having explained away the rational excuse for writing this at all, let us return to the personal sidetrack that was probably the real reason in the first place.
I personally felt something dishonest in the idea of keeping this single-minded focus on a blog. Perhaps you do not feel the same way.
Perhaps I was not rebelling against documenting my problems as much as the problems themselves, and my own inherent misunderstanding of my nature. Perhaps I was just throwing off something I can’t describe. Perhaps it was all the aliens’ fault. (Look! Humor!)
Not dishonest, then, just disagreeable. Not disagreeable in the sense that a honorable but difficult task is disagreeable, but in the sense of distasteful: something dirty, something mean.
I like watching anime. I like listening to happy, bouncy music. I like generally making a fool of myself in various ways which even now I can’t bring myself to mention.
These actions and tastes are the flowering of a gentle peace in what was very recently barren, rocky ground. I’m trying to come to grips with myself, and this is the sign of what even I can recognize as a sea change in my innermost self. I am laying down the weapons of self-censorship and cold anger and cold pride.
I am trying not to take myself so seriously.
More on this in a later letter – I’ll be laying out my whole life story (again) if I continue now.